A systematic review of the definitions and interpretations

  • Gordon, L. et al. Rewiring food systems to enhance human health and biosphere stewardship. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 100201 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 360, 987–992 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 393, 447–492 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Röös, E. et al. Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures. Glob. Environ. Chang. 47, 1–12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sans, P. & Combris, P. World meat consumption patterns: an overview of the last fifty years (1961–2011). Meat Sci. 109, 106–111 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P. Westernization of Asian diets and the transformation of food systems: implications for research and policy. Food Policy 32, 281–298 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. Editorial: Conceptualizing dietary Westernization, observing dietary transitions. Public Health Nutr. 8, 545–546 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo, U., Shaw, J. & Tuomilehto, J. Dietary Westernisation: conceptualisation and measurement in Mauritius. Public Health Nutr. 8, 608–619 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, C. K. et al. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4001–4006 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization); (2022) http://faostat.fao.org

  • Clark, M. & Tilman, D. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 064016 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordborg, M., Davis, J., Cederberg, C. & Woodhouse, A. Freshwater ecotoxicity impacts from pesticide use in animal and vegetable foods produced in Sweden. Sci. Total Environ. 581–582, 448–459 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clune, S., Crossin, E. & Verghese, K. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 766–783 (2017).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, L., Tomasik, B., Rueda, O. & Pfister, S. Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 1476–1490 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryngelsson, D., Wirsenius, S., Hedenus, F. & Sonesson, U. How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture. Food Policy 59, 152–164 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, E., Karlsson Potter, H., Wood, A., Hansson, P.-A. & Röös, E. Benchmarking the Swedish diet relative to global and national environmental targets—identification of indicator limitations and data gaps. Sustainability 12, 1407 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E. J. M., Smith, P. & Haines, A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165797 (2016)

  • Macdiarmid, J. I., Douglas, F. & Campbell, J. Eating like there’s no tomorrow: public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet. Appetite 96, 487–493 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagevos, H. & Voordouw, J. Sustainability and meat consumption: is reduction realistic? Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 9, 60–69 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. et al. Priorities for social science and humanities research on the challenges of moving beyond animal-based food systems. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 1–12 (2021).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Laestadius, L. I., Neff, R. A., Barry, C. L. & Frattaroli, S. No meat, less meat, or better meat: understanding NGO messaging choices intended to alter meat consumption in light of climate change. Environ. Commun. 10, 84–103 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, D., Galaz, V. & Daume, S. EATLancet vs yes2meat: the digital backlash to the planetary health diet. Lancet 394, 2153–2154 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, F. Americans can eat meat while cutting global heating, says agriculture secretary. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/06/americans-can-eat-meat-while-cutting-global-heating-says-agriculture-secretary (6 November 2021).

  • The National Food Strategy: The Plan (UK National Food Strategy, 2021)

  • de Boer, J., Schösler, H. & Aiking, H. ‘Meatless days’ or ‘less but better’? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite 76, 120–128 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • What Is Better Meat? https://agreenerworld.org/a-greener-world/what-is-better-meat/ (A Greener World, 2017).

  • Slow Meat https://www.slowfood.com/what-we-do/themes/slow-meat/ (Slow Food, 2018).

  • Tirado, R., Thompson, K. F., Miller, K. A. & Johnston, P. (eds) Less Is More—Reducing Meat and Dairy for a Healthier Life and Planet. Scientific Background on the Greenpeace Vision of the Meat and Dairy System Towards 2050 (Greenpeace, 2018).

  • Einkaufsratgeber Fleisch und Wurst https://www.wwf.de/aktiv-werden/tipps-fuer-den-alltag/vernuenftig-einkaufen/fleisch-einkauf?fbclid=IwAR2148bI90z5yQb_UM43qhSFFBBn0qIF1EEUKkRVsxWMwXJgx7Zan6yuwbI (WWF-Germany, 2018).

  • Sourcing Better Framework https://www.eating-better.org/uploads/Documents/Sourcing_Better_Framework.pdf (Eating Better Alliance, 2021).

  • Resare Sahlin, K., Röös, E. & Gordon, L. J. ‘Less but better’ meat is a sustainability message in need of clarity. Nat. Food 1, 520–522 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zanten, H. et al. Defining a land boundary for livestock production. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 4185–4194 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, C. & Dibb, S. (eds) Prime Cuts: Valuing the Meat We Eat (WWF-UK and Food Ethics Council, 2013).

  • Capper, J. L. Opportunities and challenges in animal protein industry sustainability: the battle between science and consumer perception. Anim. Front. 10, 7–13 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Capper, J. A sustainable future isn’t vegan, it’s flexitarian. Vet. Rec. 188, 40–40 (2021).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, J. & Aiking, H. Prospects for pro-environmental protein consumption in Europe: cultural, culinary, economic and psychological factors. Appetite 121, 29–40 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, J. & Aiking, H. Strategies towards healthy and sustainable protein consumption: a transition framework at the levels of diets, dishes, and dish ingredients. Food Qual. Prefer. 73, 171–181 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, P. Less and better meat consumption. Vet. Rec. 184, 592–593 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzek, D., Głabska, D., Sajdakowska, M. & Gutkowska, K. Analysis of association between the consumer food quality perception and acceptance of enhanced meat products and novel packaging in a population-based sample of polish consumers. Foods 9, 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölker, S., von Meyer-Höfer, M. & Spiller, A. Animal ethics and eating animals: consumer segmentation based on domain-specific values. Sustainability 11, 3907 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. & Millstone, E. P. Post-Brexit food standards. Lancet 393, 1199 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, J. Should vets eat less meat? Vet. Rec. 184, 511 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, R. A. et al. Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours. Public Health Nutr. 21, 1835–1844 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, D. F., Marques, A. C. & Fuinhas, J. A. Reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change and promote health: but is it good for the economy? Environ. Model. Assess. 25, 793–807 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahakian, M., Godin, L. & Courtin, I. Promoting ‘pro’, ‘low’, and ‘no’ meat consumption in Switzerland: the role of emotions in practices. Appetite 150, 104637 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W. & Vackier, I. Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Sci. 67, 159–168 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, G. M. Plant-based and cell-based animal product alternatives: an assessment and agenda for food tech justice. Geoforum 107, 223–226 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraher, M. Food austerity: a lifestyle choice for whom! J. Home Econ. Inst. Aust. 18, 17–25 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgilevich, A. et al. Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability 8, 1–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosse, P. R. The taste of a healthy and sustainable diet: what is the recipe for the future? Res. Hosp. Manag. 9, 35–42 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, A. & Houston, D. Cattle in the Anthropocene: four propositions. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 43, 3–16 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santini, F., Ronzon, T., Perez Dominguez, I., Araujo Enciso, S. R. & Proietti, I. What if meat consumption would decrease more than expected in the high-income countries? Bio-based Appl. Econ. 6, 37–56 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schösler, H. & de Boer, J. Towards more sustainable diets: insights from the food philosophies of ‘gourmets’ and their relevance for policy strategies. Appetite 127, 59–68 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Treich, N. Cultured meat: promises and challenges. Environ. Resour. Econ. 79, 33–61 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, J. ‘Less and better’ is the key to sustainability. Vet. Rec. 184, 490 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewern, J., Chenoweth, J., Christie, I., Keller, E. & Halevy, S. Are UK retailers well placed to deliver ‘less and better’ meat and dairy to consumers? Sustain. Prod. Consum. 28, 154–163 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolidis, C. & McLeay, F. Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy 65, 74–89 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolidis, C. & McLeay, F. To meat or not to meat? Comparing empowered meat consumers’ and anti-consumers’ preferences for sustainability labels. Food Qual. Prefer. 77, 109–122 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, J. J., Henchion, M., McCarthy, M. & McCarthy, S. N. The role of meat in strategies to achieve a sustainable diet lower in greenhouse gas emissions: a review. Meat Sci. 132, 185–195 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laestadius, L. I., Neff, R. A., Barry, C. L. & Frattaroli, S. ‘We don’t tell people what to do’: an examination of the factors influencing NGO decisions to campaign for reduced meat consumption in light of climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 29, 32–40 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, M. Ethical food: transitioning towards sustainable meat consumption? J. Consum. Ethics. 2, 26–33 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C., Kirwan, J. & Lally, R. Less meat initiatives: an initial exploration of a diet-focused social innovation in transitions to a more sustainable regime of meat provisioning. Int. J. Soc. Agr. Food 21, 189–208 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. A social practice perspective on meat reduction in Australian households: rethinking intervention strategies. Geogr. Res. 58, 240–251 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimokawa, S. Sustainable meat consumption in China. J. Integr. Agric. 14, 1023–1032 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, S. L. et al. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 746–755 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, P., Pellerin, S. & Nesme, T. Comparing crop rotations between organic and conventional farming. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A. et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat. Commun. 8, 1290 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Presto Åkerfeldt, M., Gunnarsson, S., Bernes, G. & Blanco-Penedo, I. Health and welfare in organic livestock production systems—a systematic mapping of current knowledge. Org. Agric. 11, 105–132 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Röös, E. et al. Moving beyond organic—a food system approach to assessing sustainable and resilient farming. Glob. Food Sec. 28, 100487 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Resare Sahlin, K., Carolus, J., von Greyerz, K., Ekqvist, I. & Röös, E. Delivering ‘less but better’ meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42, 24 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J. et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46, 4–17 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell, P. Ecological intensification of agriculture—sustainable by nature. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 8, 53–61 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A. Concentrating vs. spreading our footprint: how to meet humanity’s needs at least cost to nature. J. Zool. 315, 79–109 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, B., Green, R. E., Onial, M., Phalan, B. & Balmford, A. How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species? J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 73–84 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, J. O. Livestock as Resource Users and Landscape Managers—A Food Systems Perspective. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (2022).

  • Boizot-Szantai, C., Hamza, O. & Soler, L. G. Organic consumption and diet choice: an analysis based on food purchase data in France. Appetite 117, 17–28 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Systems Summit x SDGs (UN, 2021); https://www.un.org/en/food-systems-summit/sdgs

  • Leroy, F. & Cofnas, N. Should dietary guidelines recommend low red meat intake? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 60, 2763–2772 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Henchion, M., Moloney, A. P., Hyland, J., Zimmermann, J. & McCarthy, S. Review: Trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins. Animal 15, 100287 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouat, M. J., Prince, R. & Roche, M. M. Making value out of ethics: the emerging economic geography of lab-grown meat and other animal-free food products. Econ. Geogr. 95, 136–158 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, A. Alternative proteins and the (non)stuff of ‘meat’. Gastronomica 16, 66–78 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, A. E. Eating for the post-Anthropocene: alternative proteins and the biopolitics of edibility. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 43, 586–600 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitt, G. Embodied geographies of kangaroo meat. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 15, 406–426 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050 (FAO, 2018).

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 1006–1012 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ose, S. O. Using Excel and Word to structure qualitative data. J. Appl. Soc. Sci. 10, 147–162 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanja dan Ulasan Produk